Legal Opinion
United States v. C. Arthur McIntosh
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 4, 1981No. 80-3793PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES CLARK, Circuit Judge.
C. Arthur McIntosh, a Cleveland, Mississippi attorney, appeals his judgment of conviction for making false statements to the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1001. McIntosh argues that the Government failed to prove his false statement was “material” as required by section 1001. He also contends that he was prejudiced by the district court’s refusal to dismiss or sever six counts of the indictment which charged him with embezzling government funds. We find adequate proof of materiality and no error in the trial court’s refusal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Joseph Lichenstein and Leo BellaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Ernest A. WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Erle W. McGoughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Ramirez v. SlossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States Ex Rel. Longhi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. George Vernon HansenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Anthony Hayle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. John R. SwaimCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.