Legal Opinion
In Re the Matter of the Search of Kitty's East, 735 E. Colfax Avenue, Denver, Colorado. Kitty's East v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1990No. 88-2937PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
This case comes to us on appeal from the district court’s denial of the motion of Kitty’s East (Kitty’s) for return of property under Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e). The procedural posture requires that we first consider our jurisdiction to decide this appeal. Because we find that we have jurisdiction, that we should apply Rule 41(e) as it was revised after the district court’s decision, and that the seizures from Kitty’s were lawful and do not unreasonably deprive Kitty’s of its property, we affirm the decision, although upon a different analysis than that expressed by the district…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Mark A. Lee v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- New York Magazine, a Division of Primedia Magazines, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Thao Dinh LeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- State v. PerroneWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Terence Philip Ramsden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.