Legal Opinion

Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets of Omaha, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1994No. S-92-1119PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanphier, J.

This appeal arises out of a personal injury action. Janis L. Erichsen, appellant, a customer of appellee No-Frills Supermarkets of Omaha, Inc. (No-Frills), sustained injuries as a result of being dragged by a car during an attempted purse-snatching in No-Frills’ parking lot. Appellee Harold Cooperman owns the shopping center. Appellant sought *239recovery from appellees for negligently failing to warn her of prior criminal activity which occurred on “at least ten occasions” in or about the parking lot or for failing to protect her from criminal activities which were allegedly foreseeable because…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Waters v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Virginia D. v. Madesco Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Murrow v. DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Anderson v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McClung v. Delta Square Ltd. PartnershipTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Aw v. Lancaster County School Dist. 0001Nebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson/Couvillon v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Knoll v. Board of Regents of University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Proctor v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & CasualtyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API