Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Inter-City Mortgage Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 2, 1976No. 9822 and 9823PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FICKLING, Associate Judge:
Appellants brought these actions to set aside foreclosure sales of their real property. Appellees moved for summary judgment pursuant to Super.Ct.Civ.R. 56, which was granted by the trial court. This appeal followed.
Appellants primarily contend that appellees were not entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law because the trustees had conflicting interests. 1 We disagree and, therefore, we affirm.
The following undisputed facts are clear from the record. Appellants owned property in the District of Columbia. Both of these parcels of land were secured by Federal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wittlin v. GiacaloneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- National Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Jerome Silverman, Carroll Arms Associates, a District of Columbia Limited Partnership v. National Life Insurance Company, a Vermont Corporation, A/K/A National Life of VermontCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- National Life Insurance v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Yates v. District Credit Clothing, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ali Baba Co., Inc. v. Wilco, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Basch v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Perry v. Virginia Mortg. and Inv. Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rothenberg v. Ralph D. Kaiser Co. (In Re Rothenberg)District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Lewis v. Jordan Investment, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.