Legal Opinion
Casey v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 16, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action *776to recover damages for injuries sustained by Leland Casey, Jr. (plaintiff) when his aluminum ladder came into contact with a 23,000-volt power line. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was performing touch-up painting on a billboard owned by his employer, third-party defendant, Park Outdoor Advertising of New York, Inc. (Park). Supreme Court properly granted those parts of the motion of defendants Consolidated Rail Corp., Conrail, Inc.,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mascitti v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Holtz v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Noah v. IBC Acquisition Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clifton v. CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Munoz v. DJZ Realty, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2003
- Matthewson v. MatthewsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Casey v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Munoz v. Djz Realty, LLC.New York Supreme Court, Westchester County · 2003