Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1958No. 36977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

The requirements of Code § 37-1403 as to what condition or conditions must be given in a ne exeat bond are dependent upon the requirements of the court’s order, upon which the writ is issued.

While it cannot be definitely ascertained from the petition in the action on the bond exactly the tenor of the court’s order granted in the application for ne exeat, it will be presumed that the court entered a valid order and only required that the principal on the bond appear to respond to the judgment entered in the main case. Since the court’s order only required an appearance to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Koppers Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. August v. AugustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hornsby v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API