Legal Opinion

Hancock v. . Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was an action for damages on account of mental anguish. The court submitted the following issues: 1. "Did the defendant negligently fail to transmit and promptly deliver plaintiff's telegram, as alleged in the complaint?" Ans.: "Yes." 2. "What damages has plaintiff sustained by reason of defendant's nondelivery of such telegram?" Ans. "$300." From the judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appealed. We gather from the record these facts: The plaintiff and his brother resided in North Carolina, and their father, S. M. Hancock, at New Church, Va. The family burial-ground is Goodwill…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Young v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Bright v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Dayvis v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Ellison v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Beal v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API