Trounstine v. Remington Rand, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
On a hearing such as this, the well pleaded allegations of the bill are taken as true, and the plea is taken to be true in fact. If the plea were a negative plea, the rule, in respect of the allegations of the bill, would necessarily be different.
Briefly the facts shown by the bill and plea are as follows.
The defendant was incorporated under the General Corporation Law of this State on January 1, 1927. The capital stock consisted of a seven per cent cumulative first preferred stock of the par value of one hundred dollars per share (156,840 shares outstanding), an eight per cent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- Finch v. Warrior Cement Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Pittsburgh & Lake Angeline Iron Co. v. Lake Superior Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Keller v. Wilson & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1935
- Kelly v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
- Bershad v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Waggoner v. LasterSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Kahn v. Household Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Frank v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1943
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.