(PS) Flores v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY R. FLORES, No. 2:20-cv-01162-KJM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al., (ECF No. 4) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the court is defendants’1 motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff has 18 filed an opposition, and defendants have filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 9, 11.) Pursuant to Local Rule 19 230(g) the court vacated the hearing on defendants’ motion. For the reasons that follow, the 20 undersigned recommends…