Legal Opinion

Carney v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 1992No. 1-91-1494PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DiVITO

Plaintiff James Carney (Carney) was injured when his car was struck from behind by an 18-wheel tractor-trailer. Carney sued defendants Sherman Smith (Smith), the driver of the truck, and the Maxwell Company, Smith’s employer, to recover damages for his injuries. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Carney, finding that he suffered $153,000 in damages, but reduced the award to $76,500 because it assessed Carney’s comparative fault at 50%. On appeal, Carney seeks a new trial, alleging that (1) the circuit court improperly allowed covert surveillance videotapes to be played before the jury, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cisarik v. Palos Community HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Pharr v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Gibson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Johnson v. ColleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Reid v. SledgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Velarde v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Clark v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Marchese v. VinceletteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Carroll v. Preston Trucking Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API