Cisarik v. Palos Community Hospital
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple
This is a medical malpractice case brought by a brain-damaged infant against a hospital and others. As part of plaintiff’s case in chief, her counsel intends to produce a motion picture of plaintiff which would depict a typical day in her life. The purpose of the movie is to give the jury a grasp of the full extent of plaintiff’s disabilities and handicaps.
Defense counsel asked for and obtained from the trial court a protective order giving them advance notice of the filming, the right to be present at the filming, and a copy of the finished film as well as all edited out and unused footage.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- French v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Amstar Corp. v. Aurora Fast FreightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- The PEOPLE v. DonaldsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Barenbrugge v. RichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Georgacopoulos v. Univ. of Chicago Hosps. and ClinicsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Sherman v. CrynsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Barry v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Velarde v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Kimble v. Earle M. Jorgenson Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.