Legal Opinion

Cisarik v. Palos Community Hospital

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1991No. 69807PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

This is a medical malpractice case brought by a brain-damaged infant against a hospital and others. As part of plaintiff’s case in chief, her counsel intends to produce a motion picture of plaintiff which would depict a typical day in her life. The purpose of the movie is to give the jury a grasp of the full extent of plaintiff’s disabilities and handicaps.

Defense counsel asked for and obtained from the trial court a protective order giving them advance notice of the filming, the right to be present at the filming, and a copy of the finished film as well as all edited out and unused footage.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. French v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Amstar Corp. v. Aurora Fast FreightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. The PEOPLE v. DonaldsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Barenbrugge v. RichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Georgacopoulos v. Univ. of Chicago Hosps. and ClinicsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Sherman v. CrynsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Barry v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Velarde v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Kimble v. Earle M. Jorgenson Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API