Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Anthony
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 6, 1940PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
These are nineteen indictments, some of which are for larceny, and some of which are for conspiracy to steal, against two partners, H. Henry Anthony and William M. Forgrave, who had been carrying on a general stock-brokerage business under the firm name Brown, Anthony and Company. Each defendant has filed a separate bill of exceptions. In each case the only question that has been argued in connection with either bill is whether there was any evidence warranting the finding of guilty.
For convenience the cases will be divided into three classes, which will be considered successively, although…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Commonwealth v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Gorman v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Deming v. DarlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Commonwealth v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. BealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Commonwealth v. RiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Mickelson v. BarnetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.