Legal Opinion

Bello v. Cablevision System Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud and for violation of the Donnelly Act (General Business Law § 340), the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), dated June 15, 1990, which treated the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 as one for summary judgment, and having done so, granted that motion and dismissed the complaint in its entirety.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as pertains to the plaintiffs’ eleventh cause of action is dismissed, as that portion of the order was superseded by an order of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Four Seasons Hotels Ltd. v. VinnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Bradkin v. LevertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hertz Corp. v. Avis, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  2. Bello v. Cablevision System Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API