Paul Monea v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judge.
After the FBI arrested Paul Monea for money laundering, he told his attorney that the undercover agent coerced him into committing the crime. Those claims turned into allegations that the government tampered with evidence. And eventually-after the jury convicted him-Monea found a witness claiming that the undercover FBI agent lied on the stand. So he asks the court for a writ of habeas corpus, either because his trial counsel ineffectively pursued the evidence-tampering claim, or because the government's star witness perjured himself. But neither claim ends up…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Jimmy Ray Valentine (04-2116) Kenneth Jerome Valentine (05-1877) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Dwight Bullard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Duval v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Akram v. HortonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Andre Carter v. Jeff TannerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Archibald v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.