State v. Bennett
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROCK, Justice.
Defendant was convicted of selling a Schedule III controlled substance in violation of the Drug Control Act. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction and remanded for a new trial, holding that the State failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the offense occurred in the county of trial, Williamson County. To review this determination, we granted the State’s petition for certiorari.
Both Article 1, § 9, Constitution of Tennessee, and T.C.A. § 40-104, provide that the defendant has the right to trial by a jury “ . . .of the County in which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harvey v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Hopson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- Gilliland v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Yates v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HarringtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Woodson v. Porter Brown Limestone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.