Legal Opinion

State v. Bennett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1977PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of selling a Schedule III controlled substance in violation of the Drug Control Act. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction and remanded for a new trial, holding that the State failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the offense occurred in the county of trial, Williamson County. To review this determination, we granted the State’s petition for certiorari.

Both Article 1, § 9, Constitution of Tennessee, and T.C.A. § 40-104, provide that the defendant has the right to trial by a jury “ . . .of the County in which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harvey v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hopson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Gilliland v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Yates v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. HarringtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Woodson v. Porter Brown Limestone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API