Legal Opinion
White v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarlton A. Fisher, J.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment pursuant to section 473 of the Civil Practice Act. The plaintiff is a resident of the Province of Ontario in the Dominion of Canada. The issue in controversy turns on the question of ‘ ‘ status ’ ’ of the plaintiff as a “ qualified ’ ’ person under section 601 (subd. b, par. [2]) of the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation Law (Insurance Law, art. 17-A) (hereafter referred to as the MVAIC Law).
■Section 601 (subd. b, par. [2]) of the MVAIC defines a “ qualified” person as: “ (2) a resident of another state, territory or federal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Maddy v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Smith v. CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- In re the Arbitration between McGuinness & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & MoreyNew York Supreme Court · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kell v. HendersonNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Gilliam v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Dym v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Martin v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1966