Legal Opinion

San Antonio Gas Co. v. Robertson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1900No. 888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

Plaintiff in error, at the time of the occurrence in question, was engaged in manufacturing from coal, gas and its by-products, including coal tar. Defendant in error had been employed as helper to render such service about the works as should be assigned to him. He was ordered by the vice-principal of plaintiff in error to paint a boiler, which was hot, with coal tar manufactured in the business, and was instructed to heat the tar so that it might be the better applied. He heated the tar and was engaged in spreading it with a paint brush upon a part of the boiler…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nordstrom v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. The Pullman Company v. CavinessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Props v. Washington Pulley & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. City of Munday v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API