Legal Opinion

Weiner v. Borough of Stratford, County of Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 3, 1954PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

William J. Brennan, Jr., J.

An ordinance of the defendant borough provides that no person may “engage in or carry on any business, trade or calling” in the borough except as he obtains a license from the borough clerk and pays an annual license fee. But an application for a license to conduct a new business is to be made not to the borough clerk but to the planning board “which shall forward its findings with its recommendations to the Borough Council” and “the Council shall decide on granting or denying the license.”

Plaintiff proposes to conduct an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. N. J. Good Humor, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Bradley BeachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  2. Salomon v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Magnolia Development Co., Inc. v. ColesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. City of Absecon v. VetteseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. Finn v. Municipal Council of CliftonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Matthews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hudson Circle Servicenter, Inc. v. KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. Texas Power & Light Company v. City of GarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Gross v. AllanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Iscoff v. POLICE COMMISSION OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API