Legal Opinion

State v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 3, 2005No. 91,284PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, J.:

This case involves the inevitable discovery doctrine. A jury convicted Wilson Ingram of aggravated battery, possession of cocaine, possession of marijuana, and failure to have a tax stamp affixed. In an unpublished decision dated February 14, 2003, the Court of Appeals held that the police illegally searched Ingram to find the drugs but remanded for the district court to determine whether the evidence would have been inevitably discovered.

On remand, the district court determined that the drugs would have been discovered when Ingram was brought…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Hayes v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. RamirezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. HornSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. AckwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. Swank v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Allen v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. City of Norton v. WonderlyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API