Legal Opinion

People v. Allum

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 4, 1967No. Gen. 51,109PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Drucker

Defendant, James Allum, was convicted after a jury trial of murder and was sentenced to the penitentiary for not less than twenty nor more than forty years.

Contentions on Appeal(1) Defendant was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt;(2) Defendant did not receive a fair trial because:(a) remarks of the prosecutor to the jury were prejudicial;(b) the trial judge (in the presence of the jury) improperly commented upon the testimony of a prosecution witness and subsequently threatened defense counsel with contempt;(c) defendant’s request for a recess to study a statement of a prosecution…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. DonaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. The People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. The People v. BradleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. The PEOPLE v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. PriceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. People v. UtinansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. People v. NunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. James Allum v. John J. Twomey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API