Legal Opinion

Grassman v. Badgley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 5, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On bill. On exceptions to master’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, V. C.

This is a partition suit in which the master has reported that it has not been proven before him that complainant has title to any part of: the lands and premises referred to in the bill, and that the description of the property in the bill is too indefinite. The premises sought to be partitioned are vacant salt meadow lands in the city of Elizabeth, described in the bill of complaint as a tract or parcel of land and premises situate, lying and being in the city of Elizabeth, county of Union and State of New Jersey, being a tract of salt meadow containing six acres, more or less,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SydnorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  3. Island Development Co. v. McGeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  4. Newman v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. Nugent v. HayesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API