Hugh Gant v. United States

While this appeal was pending, the-Appellant was released from confinement subject to further supervision. Assuming, without deciding, that the petition sufficiently asserted a request for correction of a sentence under F.R.Crim.P. rule 35, 18 U.S.C.A., and not merely for-relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 as to. which present confinement is necessary,. Heflin v. United States, 1959, 358 U.S. 415, 79 S.Ct. 451, 3 L.Ed.2d 407; cf. Parker v. Ellis, 1960, 362 U.S. 574, 80 S.Ct. 909, 4 L.Ed.2d 963, we nevertheless; affirm.

The District Court, as this; Court earlier had done in this very same case,…