Legal Opinion

Sealey v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 1989No. 86-0869C; CA A47084PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action on August 18,1986, for injuries suffered by Scott when a 1975 Toyota Landcruiser in which he was riding overturned on April 23, 1986. The trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of defendant Toyota Motors Corporation (TMC). We affirm.

We turn first to a procedural matter raised by TMC. It is undisputed that the Landcruiser was first purchased in May, 1975, more than 11 years before the action was filed. Before TMC had been served, defendant Toyota Motors Distributors (Distributors) moved for summary judgment on the ground that the claim against it was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Little v. WimmerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Davis v. Whiting Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Erickson Air-Crane Co. v. United Technologies Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Marinelli v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sealey v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Western Helicopters, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1989
  4. Western Helicopters, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1989
  5. Sealey v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API