Legal Opinion
Madias v. Dearborn Federal Credit Union
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 8, 1996No. Civil Action 96-40043PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
GADOLA, District Judge.
In the present action, plaintiff claims that defendant has withheld his name from the slate of candidates being elected to defendant’s board of directors (hereinafter “the Board”) in violation of the Federal Credit Union Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1751, et seq. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, plaintiff requests that this court issue a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendant from holding its annual meeting on February 17, 1996, at which it intends to elect members to the Board. 1 Pursuant to Local Rule…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Friendship Materials, Inc. v. Michigan Brick, Inc., Cadillac Brick Co., and Century Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Detroit Newspaper Publishers Association v. Detroit Typographical Union No. 18, International Typographical UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- John Doe v. Duncanville Independent School District v. Kelly Kendrick, John Doe v. Duncanville Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Harrington v. Philadelphia City Employees Federal Credit UnionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Madias v. Dearborn Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- Patel v. AR Group Tennessee, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020