Legal Opinion
Olin v. Tidewater Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 11, 1995No. Civ. A. G-95-174PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KENT, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the motion of Tidewater Inc., Tidewater Crewing Limited, and Zapata Gulf Crews, Inc. (collectively, the Defendants) for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion is hereby GRANTED.
I. Background
In this action, Julio Olin asserts against the Defendants a claim under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688, as well as claims of unseaworthiness and failure to pay maintenance and cure benefits.
The Defendants supply crews for vessels that support…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnnie Leonard, Sr. v. Dixie Well Service & Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- D.E.W., Inc. v. Local 93, Laborers' International Union of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Samuel v. TIDEWATER MARINE SERVICESDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1996
- Mansel v. Baker Hughes, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002