United States v. Guillermo Horta-Alvarez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Guillermo Horta-Alvarez appeals his 67-month sentence of imprisonment after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base. Horta-Alvarez contends that the district court’s sentence was procedurally unreasonable because the court relied on a fact not in the record — that he processed cocaine into crack cocaine for distribution. And he asserts that the error was not harmless because that clearly erroneous fact was one of two reasons given for denying him the full extent of his requested variance. We agree with Horta-Alvarez on both points, and we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. BarnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Jay Fredrick NagelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Frank Kendrick, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.