Legal Opinion
United States v. Jay Fredrick Nagel
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 1, 2016No. 15-14087PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Circuit Judge:
Jay Frederick Nagel appeals his 292-month sentence, ijnposed after he pleaded guilty to three counts of enticement of a minor to engage in sexual activity under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). On appeal, Nagel challenges the procedural and substantive reasonableness of his sentence. However, after review of the record and consideration of the parties’ briefs, we determine that Nagel’s sentence is both procedurally and substantively sound. First, the district court’s decision not to group Count One and Count Two of Nagel’s convictions was in accordance with § 3D1.2 of the United…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. IreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Montijo-MaysonetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Andres GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Blaine Joyner CoglianeseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Albert Vincent HicksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Amol KhedkarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.