Nichols v. Continental Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action of contract on a policy of insurance against loss by fire. The case is before us on a report, wherein it is recited that the plaintiff owned a dwelling house, in the town of Falmouth, which was insured against loss by fire by five separate policies, issued by five different companies in various amounts. All the policies were issued by the same agent, whose office was in the town of Falmouth, and were payable to the same mortgagee as his interest might appear. The house was destroyed by fire on November 24, 1925, all the policies being then in force.
The plaintiff learned of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parker v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Boruszweski v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Bennett v. Ætna InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Swaine v. Teutonia Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
3Cited by10 opinions
- Royal-Globe Insurance v. CravenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Segal v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Depot Cafe Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Those Certain Underwriters at LloydsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kothe v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.