Legal Opinion

Boruszweski v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 21, 1904PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is an action on a policy insuring the plaintiffs against loss by fire upon a dwelling house and barn and certain personal property contained therein. The defence is that the plaintiffs never have rendered the sworn statement in writing called for by the policy, which is in the form prescribed by R. L. c. 118, § 60. The plaintiffs’ contention is that this has been waived by the defendant, and that they proved a custom making it unnecessary. The case is here on a report by the presiding judge, who directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant.

The facts relied on by the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  2. Weidert v. State Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Parker v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Smith & Dove Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Searle v. Dwelling House InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. DeFriest v. BradleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Greenough v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Shapiro v. Security InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Shute v. BillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API