Legal Opinion
Flores v. Allstate Texas Lloyds
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 14, 2019No. 4:18-cv-00769Unknown
1Opinion
Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 14, 201¢ FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION ARCELIA FLORES, ef al, § Plaintiffs, : VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:18-CV-769 ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYDS, : Defendant. ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Allstate Texas Lloyds’ (“Allstate”) Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26). Plaintiffs Areclia and Wil Flores have not responded, and the time in which to do so has passed. Having considered Plaintiffs’ First Amended Petition, the Motion for Summary Judgment, and applicable…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alex John, Jr. v. State of Louisiana (Board of Trustees for State Colleges and Universities)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Wilton M. EVERSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MBANK DALLAS, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.