Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Justice.
The appellant’s petition for rehearing is granted to allow us to consider on its merits the question of whether the lower court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that in order to avoid the release executed by the plaintiff, he must prove a mutual mistake of fact by clear and unequivocal evidence. As stated in our opinion, the appellant requested the court to instruct the jury that the plaintiff must prove mutual mistake by “clear and unequivocal evidence”, but the court refused the request and instead instructed that proof of a mutual mistake need appear only by a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. CurlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Callen v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Jimenez v. O'BrienUtah Supreme Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ulibarri v. ChristensonUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Maxfield v. Denver and Rio Grande Western R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1958
- Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
- Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande WR Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
- Maxfield v. Denver and Rio Grande Western R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.