Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Hibernia National Bank
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1981No. 12037PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REDMANN, Judge.
At one point in a long-litigated domestic relations dispute, separated spouses (now divorced) deposited the $29,000 proceeds from a house into a “both signatures required” savings account with defendant Hibernia Bank. Tax levies against the ex-husband alone, totalling $22,711, were satisfied out of that account. The ex-wife now sues the bank and the ex-husband for an accounting and a money judgment “for her share” of the account. The trial court transferred her demand against the ex-husband to the court in which an action for partition of their community is being tried and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Raffaele v. Granger, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Wm. P. Stuart, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Arizona v. J. E. Willis and King-Hoover Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Third Nat. Bank & Trust Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- Cookmeyer v. CookmeyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Lapp v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sylvester v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Hodge v. NanceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Rush Ex Rel. Estate of Wright v. South Carolina National BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Bower v. MenardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Brenda Bower v. Marx MenardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012