United States v. Third Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, Chief Judge.
This is an action of a civil nature arising under the Internal Revenue Laws. and instituted pursuant to the authority and sanction of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States.
The parties stipulated the facts, and on the basis of such the Court makes the following findings of fact:
1. The defendant is a corporation, organized and existing under the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C.A. § 21 et seq., with its principal office and place of business in Scranton, Pennsylvania.
2. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue duly…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cochrane's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Mardis, Administratrix v. SteenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Mader v. StemlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Flanagan v. NashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Reap v. Wyoming Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bank of Nevada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Walnut Valley State Bank v. StovallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
- United States v. Stock Yards Bank of Louisville, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.