Legal Opinion
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local No. 115 v. Armour & Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 11, 1985No. C-84-0080 RFPPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MODIFIED ORDER RE SANCTIONS
PECKHAM, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION:
On June 29, 1984, the court entered an order awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Armour & Co., from the plaintiffs’ law firm (hereinafter “Unions’ counsel”). On July 30, 1984, Armour & Co.’s counsel turned in an itemized list of expenses it claims Armour is entitled to under the June 29th order. The total is $22,046.68. Unions’ counsel contests the amount of the claim, and also attacks the court’s award of attorney’s fees under Rule 11.
For the reasons set forth below, the court affirms its order granting Armour & Co. sanctions.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tedeschi v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Zaldivar v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1984
- Goldman v. BeldenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1984
- Taylor v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1984
3Cited by20 opinions
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Albert J. Gaiardo and Patricia Gaiardo, His Wife v. Ethyl Corporation, A/K/A Ethyl Corporation, Visqueen DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Robert G. Jackson, Robert P. Gettys, Attorney-Appellant v. The Law Firm of O'hara, Ruberg, Osborne and TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Michael J. Dubisky, Trustee for the V.S. Trust I v. E. Keith OwensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Nassau-Suffolk Ice Cream, Inc. v. Integrated Resources, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.