Legal Opinion

Kahn v. State Land Office Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1947No. Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 43,548PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This -is a suit for an injunction and a declaratory judgment against the State land office board. By stipulation followed by a court order Anthony F. Posnik was added as a party defendant.

The facts are not in dispute. In September, 1942, certain property in the city of Detroit was offered for sale under the provisions of Act No. 155, § 8, Pub. Acts 1937, as amended (Comp. Laws Supp. 1945, § 3723-8, Stat. Ann. 1946 Cum. Supp. § 7.958), by the State • land office board through its supervisory sales agent, Tri-County Land Agency, Inc., at an appraised value of $9,600. No offers to purchase were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. RobertsonUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Leavy v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Emmons v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Porter v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michigan Paytel Joint Venture v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Michigan Paytel Joint Venture v. City Of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API