Legal Opinion

In Re Parker-Young Co.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided August 13, 1936No. 4069PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on the debtor’s petition for confirmation of the debtor’s plan filed March 11, 1936, which was duly submitted to the stockholders for their consideration resulting in its acceptance by both preferred and common stockholders. At the hearing before the court it was disclosed that more than two-thirds of the preferred stockholders and an overwhelming majority of the common stockholders had voted in favor of the plan, and the question presented is whether it is fair and equitable and 'is feasible.

In brief the plan provides that all the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. In re Prudence Bonds Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Penn Central Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. In Re Chicago, G. W. R.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1939
  3. Frank Scofield, Collector of Internal Revenue v. San Antonio Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Frank Scofield, Collector of Internal Revenue v. San Antonio Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API