Legal Opinion · Dissent

Frank Scofield, Collector of Internal Revenue v. San Antonio Transit Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1955No. 14784Published

1DissentRives, Circuit Judge

Further consideration has convinced me that the taxpayer corporation acquired the assets of Smith Brothers Properties Company in a nontaxable reorganization as defined in Section 112(g) (1) (B) of the Revenue Act of 1936 (quoted in footnote 2 to the main opinion). The appellant collector insisted that there was no such reorganization upon the following grounds: (A) A continuity of interest, which is requisite to a reorganization, was lacking; (B) The taxpayer did not acquire “substantially all the properties” of the alleged transferor; (C) The taxpayer did not acquire the property of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Helvering v. Alabama Asphaltic Limestone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. LeTulle v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Cullinan v. Walker, Collector of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Rockefeller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API