Christie v. People of Aurora Ex Rel. State
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
We granted certiorari pursuant to C.A.R. 49(a)(1) to review the district court’s ruling on appeal in People of the City of Aurora v. Christie (No. 90CR693, Arapahoe County, Colorado, February 21, 1991). We affirm.
I
The People of the City of Aurora (city) charged John Phillip Christie (defendant) with battery in violation of a city ordinance. The city is a home rule city. At his arraignment, the defendant apparently was advised of his rights by means of a videotape. Proceeding pro se, the defendant was convicted in a trial to the court. Because of the court’s failure to properly advise him…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People Ex Rel. City of Arvada v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hinojos-Mendoza v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- People v. ShellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Barzellone v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- State v. BelvinSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.