Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Day

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1995No. 95-281PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Randall Mark Rudolph (Rudolph), pro se, has filed herein his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Attorney General of the State of Montana and legal counsel for the Department of Corrections has responded on behalf of the State.

In October 1987, Rudolph was convicted after a jury trial, of robbery and sentenced to a term of years at the Montana State Hospital in lieu of prison incarceration. Rudolph was designated a dangerous offender for purposes of parole eligibility. We denied his petition for writ of habeas corpus pending appeal on February 14, 1989, and subsequently confirmed his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Tecca v. McCormickMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Remington v. Montana Department of Corrections & Human ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. RudolphMontana Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RedcrowMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Beach v. DayMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. D. Steilman v. MichaelMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. SchaffMontana Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API