State v. MacLeod
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The issues in this theft case are whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a “directed verdict” made at the close of the State’s evidence, and whether the court abused its discretion in not granting defendant a continuance to obtain a witness. We uphold the trial court.
Defendant was indicted for theft of a motorcycle belonging to Richard Stimson. RSA 637:3. He was tried before the court without a jury and found guilty.
At the close of the State’s case, defendant called to the witness stand one Stillman Titus, who claimed the privilege against self-incrimination and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BreestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- State v. LinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- State v. DupuySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. FloydSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- State v. ScioneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. MonahanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984