Legal Opinion

State v. MacLeod

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 20, 1979No. 79-036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

The issues in this theft case are whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a “directed verdict” made at the close of the State’s evidence, and whether the court abused its discretion in not granting defendant a continuance to obtain a witness. We uphold the trial court.

Defendant was indicted for theft of a motorcycle belonging to Richard Stimson. RSA 637:3. He was tried before the court without a jury and found guilty.

At the close of the State’s case, defendant called to the witness stand one Stillman Titus, who claimed the privilege against self-incrimination and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BreestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  2. State v. LinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. State v. DupuySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. State v. FloydSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  5. State v. ScioneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  2. State v. MonahanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API