Harrow v. Farrow's Heirs
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal prom the Clarke Circuit. Chancery. Case 38. Case stated. An attorney at law has no an* thorily to release a [judgment oh* tained by him for his client, without a new warrant, he remains attorney while the judgment may be executed without new proceedings, for the enforcement of the judgment, not for its release.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Ewins
A judgment was rendered at the September term, in favor of John Doe, on the demise of Harrow and others, against Farrow’s heirs, for five sixths of 120 acres of land, under the mandate of this Court, founded upon a *127verdict found in favor of the lessors in 1825, with a stay of execution till the next term of the Court, by consent of parties. At the September term, 1831, Henry Daniel, the attorney of the lessors, appeared in Court, and acknowledged satisfaction of the said judgment, and agreed that execution should never issue thereon, which was entered of record. In May, 1837, a scire facias…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Smith's heirs v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1861
- Watt v. BrookoverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hall v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Hall v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Jenkins v. City of Bowling GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.