Legal Opinion
In re Edwin S.
New York City Family Court
Decided November 22, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stephen J. Bogacz, J.
The United States Supreme Court introduced the now familiar Miranda warnings1 (see Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [1966]) to American jurisprudence over 45 years ago. In determining that the general principle that citizens are presumed to know the law did not extend to police detainees being subjected to custodial interrogation, the High Court directed that the police must first advise detainees of those rights “in clear and unequivocal terms.” (Id. at 467-468.) An ever-expanding body of state and federal case law has provided interpretive meaning to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RivasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
- In re Raquan W.New York City Family Court · 2017