Legal Opinion · Dissent

Farmers Bankers Life Ins. Co. v. Baxley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1949No. 33287Published

1DissentHalley, J.

The majority opinion in this case is contradictory to the evidence.

The two errors to which I wish to call your attention are:

First, the admission of incompetent testimony over the objection and exception of the defendant. That was the testimony of the witness John E. McCain, wherein he was permitted to testify as to a statement made to him by one Bornheim, who had been soliciting agent of the policy on which the plaintiff based his suit. He testified that Bornheim, who was not a doctor, told him that, as far as he knew, Mrs. Baxley was in good health. This is rank hearsay, and there was no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Inter-Ocean Oil Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Ft. Smith & W. Ry. Co. v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Ravelin Mining Co. v. ViersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Kessler, Adm. v. Phila. R.T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. National Life & Accident Ins. v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API