Royston v. Horner
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from a decee of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Dennis, J.), dismissing the bill of complaint, the Court holding that there was no fraud or duress practised in procuring the decree of August 29th, 1889, for the purpose of vacating which the bill in this case was filed.
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
On the sixth of April, 1888, John W. Royston filed his bill in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City against the same appellee against whom the bill in this case was filed by him and his committee. In the first bill he alleged his own imbecility and unfitness to attend to business ; that he could be easily influenced ; that, whilst in this condition of mind he had been induced to sell to the appellee certain valuable property for an insignificant sum; that another and the appellee combined and conspired to cheat him ; that they, through fraudulent statements and promises, induced him also to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Royston v. HornerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
- Rouskulp v. KershnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alvey v. AlveyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Ashman v. AshmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Oertel v. OertelBaltimore City Circuit Court · 1926