Legal Opinion

State v. Haire

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1989No. 8926SC266PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in failing to submit to the jury the lesser included offense of misdemeanor larceny. He asserts that the jury should have been allowed to consider whether the items stolen had a fair market value of $400.00 or less. Larceny of goods with a value of more than 400 dollars is a felony while larceny of goods where the value is 400 dollars or less is a misdemeanor. G.S. 14-72(a). The term “value” in this section means fair market value and not the replacement cost of the goods. State v. Morris, 318 N.C. 643, 645, 350 S.E.2d 91, 93…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. DeesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API