Gomez v. Miller
District Court, S.D. New York
1DissentMoore, Circuit Judge
In my opinion, the federal courts are without jurisdiction to pass upon the *334merits of plaintiffs’ complaint. Despite references in the complaint to the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the relief sought is actually by way of habeas corpus. Jurisdiction fails because plaintiffs have not exhausted State remedies as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b).
In the light of the two recent pronouncements of the Supreme Court in Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 92 S.Ct. 509, 30 L.Ed.2d 438 (1971) and Humphrey v. Cady, 405 U.S. 504, 92 S.Ct. 1048, 31 L.Ed.2d 394 (1972), jurisdiction must be recognized as…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDENSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. LallyNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.