Carranza v. Pool
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ERIC CARRANZA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-3087 ) BUTCH POOL and AARON ZEISLER, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE: Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 27) and a Memorandum in Support thereof (d/e 28) filed by Defendants Butch Pool and Aaron Zeisler (“Defendants”). Defendants have shown that Plaintiff Eric Carranza (“Plaintiff”) cannot prove essential elements of either Plaintiff’s malicious prosecution claim or his civil conspiracy…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.