Legal Opinion

(RC) 2 Pharma Connect, LLC v. Mission Pharmacal Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 14, 2022No. 1:21-cv-11096Unknown

1Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: Sonnac nnnnns IK DATE FILED:_09/14/2022 (RC) 2 PHARMA CONNECT, LLC, : Plaintiff, : 21-cv-11096 (LJL) -v- : OPINION AND ORDER MISSION PHARMACAL COMPANY, : Defendant. : we KX LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Defendant Mission Pharmacal Company (“Defendant” or “Mission”) moves for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and the Court’s inherent power against Plaintiff (RC) 2 Pharma Connect, LLC (‘“Plaintiff’ or “(RC) 2”). Dkt. No. 36.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  4. Julia Karen Eisemann v. Miriam Greene, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API