Legal Opinion

People v. Ali A.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 2006No. C049808PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBIE, J.

The question in this juvenile wardship proceeding is whether the juvenile court has discretion to set a maximum term of physical confinement when the court commits the minor to the custody of his parents subject to probationary supervision, rather than to the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Facilities (formerly, the Department of the Youth Authority) (hereafter, the CYA). The answer to that question is “no.” When a juvenile ward is allowed to remain in his parents’ custody, there is no physical confinement and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. Kazuo G.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. People v. Jacob J.California Court of Appeal · 2005

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. P.A.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. A.C.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. In re G.C.California Supreme Court · 2020
  4. In re Jonathan A. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. In re M.G. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API