Legal Opinion

Sanco Finance Company v. Neal

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1963No. 40236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an appeal by The Sanco Finance Company (plaintiff below) from a judgment rendered on jury verdict in favor of Barton Neal and Nellie Neal, husband and wife, (defendants below) in an action wherein plaintiff sued for judgment upon defendants’ promissory note. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

Plaintiff’s petition alleged a promissory note from defendants to Filter Queen of Oklahoma, Inc., dated October 10, 1960, in the sum of $339.60 payable in 24 installments, alleging the note was “properly assigned to the plaintiff,” and non-payment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Publishers Finance Co. v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Sharp v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Sharp v. GossettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stovall v. Liberty Plan of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Commerce Acceptance of Oklahoma City, Inc. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API